tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6480123380312839307.post4174919004785294998..comments2009-12-30T03:12:25.099+01:00Johan Myrbergerhttps://profiles.google.com/110540343778852647721noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6480123380312839307.post-34886404546452077602009-08-01T12:33:04.748+02:002009-08-01T12:33:04.748+02:00search-ebook.com<br />Good answer, I am looking for the solution of the same question. Find the movies or mp3 you are looking for at search-ebook.com the most comprehensive source for free-to-try files downloads on the Webqwehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06011559117733210980noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6480123380312839307.post-32145503767941569732007-11-07T13:41:00.000+01:002007-11-07T13:41:00.000+01:00Great research! :)<BR/><BR/>From a monetizing perspective the Social networks still have some to proof.<BR/><BR/>And the lauch last night of the new Fb SocialAds platform can become really interesting!<BR/><BR/>Check out the last weeks <A HREF="http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_45/b4057047.htm" REL="nofollow">BW article</A> about monetizing the Social networks, Google's Brin gives a short but exciting challenge for Social networks like Fb.<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://blogg.earlyoctober.se/2007/10/29/den-social-grafen/ " REL="nofollow">Our blog</A> (in Swedish) at has some comments and simple math about the monetizing potential of Fb.<BR/><BR/>See you at the next networking lunch! ;)Danielwww.secondsweden.senoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6480123380312839307.post-8219431571845849012007-11-01T12:02:00.000+01:002007-11-01T12:02:00.000+01:00Hi Johan, thanks for the comments.<BR/>Here's my clarifiactions:<BR/><BR/>1) Indeed. I meant "20-24", nothing else. I corrected that.<BR/><BR/>2) My understanding (or guess) is that you get the number of users that stated "Sweden" as country during registration. It does not state anything on the usage itself. Rather the number of Swedes that have created a Facebook account.<BR/><BR/>3) I haven't looked into the other countries. However I noticed that neither Finland or Denmark is available to "datamine" the way I did. If this is because they are still small Facebook markets or for some other reason I don't know,<BR/><BR/>4) The "viral" spread of a specific social network like Facebook takes of when some kind of critical mass is reached ("the crowd goes where the crowd is"). There has been a lot of media coverage of Facebook in Sweden recently. Mainstream newspapers like Aftonbladet have had articles on "how do use Facebook" etc.<BR/><BR/>In other countries you might find other SoNets that growing. Eg orkut is big in Brazil and Pakistan, but very small in other countries.<BR/><BR/>The trends of social networks seems quite global, but the brand that attracts users in a specific country varies.<BR/><BR/>5)Oh, not that old... More than 30 years ago I guess...Johan Myrbergerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06845165552307954066noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6480123380312839307.post-50954018576970541852007-10-31T17:17:00.000+01:002007-10-31T17:17:00.000+01:00Thanks, Johan. Great job.<BR/><BR/>I’m still a beginner when it comes to Facebook and other similar websites, but here are some thoughts and wonderings concerning your post.<BR/><BR/>1) First a small thing: It’s a bit misleading to write “largest coverage is the age span 15-24“ as the 25-29 group is actually larger than the 15-19 group. For marketing people, this might matter.<BR/>2) Just for clarity: What kind of numbers is it that you get from the Facebook Flyers Pro utility? Is it the number of people hitting any Facebook page in a given day? It’s not the number of registrations at Facebook? How do you identify the nationality of a user – is it his network, the location of his computer, or something else? I tried to find this information in your post – I’m sorry if I after all have missed it.<BR/>3) I find it amazing that a country like Finland (and also, to a smaller extent, Denmark) doesn’t show up at all in the statistics. Until I have understood why this is so, I’ll be a bit skeptical about these numbers. When I read that Sweden ranked #2 on the penetration list for non-English speaking countries, I thought Finland was likely to be #1. I guess what I had in mind was the development of mobile phone usage some ten years ago. As far as I have understood (this is off the top of my head – I haven’t checked any websites) Finland was leading that league (# of users per capita), with Sweden coming in second. To me, that development appears to be a likely parallel (surely, it cannot only haven been driven by the existence Nokia?) to the current development of Facebook users.<BR/>4) If it is indeed correct that Facebook is hardly not used at all in neither Finland nor Denmark, then that’s quite interesting in itself. More generally, it would be interesting to get a better understanding of the mechanics behind the spread of a phenomenon like Facebook. I guess it’s just one example of cultural transmission, like the spread of a new word in the language or a social norm. The closest parallel might be a new movie, perhaps in particular one that has a slow start, hardly noticed at the premiere, but then takes off thanks to mouth-to-mouth.<BR/>5) So how old were you when you were dreaming of working at the Statistiska Centralbyraan?Johan Lagerlofwww.johanlagerlof.orgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6480123380312839307.post-43056980642836019262007-10-31T13:10:00.000+01:002007-10-31T13:10:00.000+01:00Great work!<BR/><BR/>I might steal a few or your statistics for presentations. Big numbers always do amazing things for social media credibility.<BR/><BR/>What I find fascinating when I read Jeff's post the other day is that Lebanon is in fourth place of non-English speaking countries. I would have guessed on Mexico, Singapore, Israel or Egypt.Annika Lidnehttp://www.lidne.comnoreply@blogger.com